Local recurrence of non-lentigo maligna melanoma in situ and safety excision margins: A systematic review.

Publication date: Apr 15, 2025

The strength of evidence supporting a 2-step wide local excision (WLE) with 5 mm safety margins for melanoma in situ non-lentigo maligna (non-LM) type, compared with narrower margins, is unclear. This review aims to compare the frequency of local recurrence (LR) with different safety margins, after the complete surgical excision (R0) of non-LM MIS. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library up to March 17, 2024. The PRISMA checklist was used. Of 3,047 articles retrieved, seven retrospective studies were included, enrolling a total of 1,526 non-LM MIS cases excised with clear safety margins, after WLE (6 studies) or Mohs surgery (1 study). Most non-LM MIS were located on the trunk/extremities (68%-100%). Narrower margins were used in four studies, ranging from no WLE to 4 mm, and there was only one LR. Standard or wider margins were used in the remaining three studies reporting only two LR. The median follow-up ranged from 48 months to 6. 6 years. The overall certainty and quality of evidence were very low. These findings of our systematic review highlight that current guidelines recommending the re-excision for non-LM MIS with clear initial margins lack strong evidence in support of this practice.

Concepts Keywords
48months death
Library excision
Melanoma margins
Retrospective Melanoma in situ
metastasis
recurrence
surgery
systematic review

Semantics

Type Source Name
disease MESH recurrence
disease MESH lentigo maligna
disease MESH melanoma
pathway KEGG Melanoma
disease MESH death
disease MESH metastasis

Original Article

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *