Publication date: May 22, 2025
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has highlighted the importance and challenges of the sample collection component of the diagnostic cycle. Although combined nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs (NOS) have historically been the gold standard of sampling, the saline gargle (SG) sampling method has been evaluated and implemented in multiple jurisdictions for respiratory pathogen detection. It has proven to be user-acceptable to patients, simple to collect, and highly sensitive to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection by molecular methods when compared to swabs. We performed a prospective cross-sectional study to evaluate the SG collection method against the NOS collection method for molecular detection and next-generation sequencing (NGS) of SARS-CoV-2 in Botswana. Paired SG and NOS samples were collected and underwent nucleic acid extraction prior to molecular detection. The SG had an overall sensitivity of 81. 3% (95% CI: 68. 8%%-96. 0%), while the NOS had an overall sensitivity of 96. 9% (95% CI: 84. 3-99. 4). Paired samples with a mean crossing threshold value of
| Concepts | Keywords |
|---|---|
| Botswana | diagnostics |
| Coronavirus | gargle |
| Molecular | SARS-CoV-2 |
| Oropharyngeal | |
| Severe |
Semantics
| Type | Source | Name |
|---|---|---|
| disease | MESH | coronavirus disease 2019 |
| drug | DRUGBANK | Gold |
| disease | IDO | pathogen |
| disease | IDO | nucleic acid |