A Multidisciplinary Survey Comparing Academic and Community Critical Care Clinicians’ ARDS Practice and the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Publication date: Jun 23, 2025

Barriers to recognizing and treating acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) exist. Prior studies have not investigated whether these barriers differ between academic and community settings, nor whether there were differences in critical care clinicians’ reported ARDS management strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Grounded in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we sought to determine whether there are differences between academic and community critical care clinicians in their team- and ICU-based culture; interprofessional communication; knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to ARDS recognition and management; and their ICU organization and ARDS management associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Multidisciplinary survey from September, 2020 to April, 2021 of critical care physicians, nurses, advanced practice providers, and respiratory therapists (RTs) in six academic and nine community hospitals across the United States and Canada. Individual item and cumulative domain scores were compared between academic and community clinicians. Statistical adjustment was performed for multiple comparisons. 1,906 clinicians responded to at least one survey item (53% response rate). Mean (SD) culture scores were higher for community physicians vs. academic physicians (5. 3 [1. 8] vs. 4. 4 [2. 0], P

Concepts Keywords
Canada Academic
Pandemic Ards
Research Barriers
September Care
Therapists Clinicians
Community
Covid
Critical
Management
Multidisciplinary
Pandemic
Physicians
Practice
Respiratory
Survey

Semantics

Type Source Name
disease MESH COVID-19 Pandemic
disease MESH acute respiratory distress syndrome

Original Article

(Visited 3 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *