Diagnosis and symptom assessment in telepsychiatry vs. face-to-face settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Publication date: Jun 25, 2025

Telepsychiatry is increasingly integral to psychiatric practice. However, few reviews have examined the concordance between assessments conducted in telepsychiatric and face-to-face settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the agreement between telepsychiatric and face-to-face settings in the diagnosis and symptom assessment of various psychiatric disorders. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Studies evaluating the concordance between telepsychiatric and face-to-face settings in the diagnosis and symptom assessment of various psychiatric disorders were included and analyzed. Of the 6875 studies in the initial search, 22 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the analyses. The diagnostic concordance for 16 psychiatric disorders was “almost perfect” between the two settings (N = 16, n = 848, Cohen’s _705 = 0. 824, confidence interval [CI] = 0. 466 to 0. 950, P 

Concepts Keywords
Initial concordance
Library diagnostic assessment
Psychiatry meta‐analysis
Telepsychiatry symptom assessment
telepsychiatry

Semantics

Type Source Name
disease MESH psychiatric disorders
drug DRUGBANK Methionine

Original Article

(Visited 4 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *