Novel Biomarkers for SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Publication date: Jun 01, 2025

Background: COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has posed significant challenge to global healthcare systems, necessitating reliable biomarkers to predict disease severity and mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the prognostic value of novel biomarkers in COVID-19 patients. The aim of this study was to identify and prioritize the most prognostically relevant novel biomarkers associated with COVID-19 outcomes. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available evidence. A systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science was performed to identify studies on the COVID-19 biomarkers. Observational studies that compared poor (severe disease/mortality) and good outcomes were included. For continuous measures, standard mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve analyses for the biomarkers were used. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: Of the 2907 screened studies, 38 were included (21 in the meta-analysis). MR-proADM showed higher levels of prediction for poor outcomes (SMD = 1. 40, 95% CI: 1. 11-1. 69; AUC 0. 74-0. 96; sensitivity, 85%; specificity, 71%). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) showed a high correlation with disease severity (SMD = 1. 07, 95% CI: 0. 79-1. 35; AUC 0. 73-0. 98; sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 78%). Increased KL-6 levels were associated with lung injury (SMD = 1. 22, 95% CI: 0. 24-2. 19; AUC 0. 85-0. 95). Other biomarkers (suPAR, miR-155, Galectin-3) showed promise but lacked sufficient data for pooled analysis. Heterogeneity was observed among the included studies in terms of diagnostic accuracy. These findings indicate that elevated levels of MR-proADM, NLR, and KL-6 are significantly associated with COVID-19 prognostic accuracy to guide patient management. Conclusions: MR-proADM, NLR, and KL-6 levels demonstrated strong prognostic value for COVID-19 severity and mortality. These biomarkers can enhance clinical decision-making.

Open Access PDF

Concepts Keywords
Covid biomarkers
Healthcare COVID-19
Heterogeneity KL-6
Ottawa MR-proADM
Reliable SARS-CoV-2

Semantics

Type Source Name
disease MESH SARS-CoV-2 Infection
pathway REACTOME SARS-CoV-2 Infection
disease MESH lung injury
drug DRUGBANK Coenzyme M
disease MESH acute respiratory distress syndrome
disease MESH cytokine storm
disease MESH respiratory failure
disease MESH death
disease IDO host
disease MESH inflammation
disease MESH pulmonary fibrosis
disease MESH fibrosis
disease MESH clinical relevance
disease IDO country
drug DRUGBANK Saquinavir
disease IDO quality
disease MESH complications
disease IDO immune response
disease IDO intervention
drug DRUGBANK (S)-Des-Me-Ampa
disease MESH Pneumonia
drug DRUGBANK Ribostamycin
disease MESH Adenovirus Infections
disease MESH emergency
disease MESH Critically Ill
disease MESH Allergy
disease MESH Asthma
pathway KEGG Asthma
disease MESH sepsis
drug DRUGBANK Creatinine
disease MESH infection
disease IDO production
drug DRUGBANK Sulfasalazine

Original Article

(Visited 6 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *