Barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of Community Health Worker programmes in high-income countries: a systematic review.

Publication date: Jul 17, 2026

Global interest in Community Health Workers (CHWs) is rising as health systems seek to address persistent health inequities and the social determinants of health. However, in high-income countries (HICs), CHW implementation remains fragmented. This systematic review synthesises evidence on the factors that act as barriers and facilitators to the implementation and integration of CHW programmes across HIC primary healthcare settings. We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, and CINAHL for studies published between January 2001 and August 2025. Inclusion focused on qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods papers regarding CHW implementation in HICs. Methodological quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Data were synthesised using a ‘Best Fit’ Framework Synthesis and confidence in the findings was assessed via GRADE-CERQual. Seventy-two papers were included (US n = 64; UK n = 4; Australia n = 3; Belgium n = 1), primarily comprising qualitative and mixed methods designs. Key facilitators included leadership buy-in, the presence of implementation champions, and established community partnerships that enabled resource sharing. Prominent barriers included precarious, short-term funding models that prioritised quantitative outputs over relational labour; hierarchical medical power dynamics; and disconnected IT systems that necessitated redundant data entry. The COVID-19 pandemic acted as a catalyst, elevating the CHW role within public health infrastructure while simultaneously exposing digital divides and structural fragility. GRADE-CERQual ratings indicated high confidence in findings regarding funding sustainability, training, and integration. The evidence synthesised in this review reveals a fundamental misalignment within current health services: while CHWs are valued for their unique relational capacity, they remain systemically undermined by transactional health system designs. Achieving sustainability requires a strategic shift toward long-term, flexible funding models and the workforce development of supportive infrastructure, including reflective supervision and standardised training. Integration must move beyond short-term, project-based initiatives toward a resilient and permanent public health workforce capable of addressing structural health inequities. PROSPERO: CRD42022310789.

Open Access PDF

Concepts Keywords
Community Health Workers
Framework synthesis
Health inequities
High-income countries
Implementation science
Primary health care
Systematic review
Workforce development

Semantics

Type Source Name
disease MESH included
disease MESH COVID-19 pandemic
pathway REACTOME Reproduction
disease MESH chronic diseases
drug DRUGBANK Spinosad
drug DRUGBANK Factor IX Complex (Human)
disease MESH PCC
drug DRUGBANK Etoperidone
drug DRUGBANK Methionine
disease MESH GPs
disease MESH trauma
disease MESH plan
disease MESH face
disease MESH confusion
disease MESH obesity
disease MESH NHS
disease MESH strain
disease MESH vicarious trauma
drug DRUGBANK 3 7 11 15-Tetramethyl-Hexadecan-1-Ol
disease MESH ARC
disease MESH infectious diseases
disease MESH non communicable diseases
drug DRUGBANK Ademetionine
disease MESH cancer
disease MESH asthma
pathway KEGG Asthma
drug DRUGBANK Sulfasalazine
disease MESH Miras
drug DRUGBANK L-Aspartic Acid
drug DRUGBANK Silver
disease MESH emergency
disease MESH hypertension

Original Article

(Visited 4 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *